In today’s competitive job market, with increasing service expectations from the community, councils can’t afford to make mistakes in hiring. A well-prepared interview panel ensures a fair, transparent and bias-free process so you select candidates on their merits.
If you are part of a council interview panel, this course provides the tools and techniques to conduct structured and fair behavioural interviews. You’ll learn to gather evidence effectively and help the hiring manager make informed, equitable and unbiased hiring decisions.
This Interview Mastery for Council Panel Members course is designed for groups of employees in your council, whether recruiting internal or external candidates. It suits hiring managers, team leaders and other colleagues involved in the recruitment process who want to enhance their interviewing skills and take a fair and structured approach to candidate selection.
In this Interview Mastery for Panel Members course, participants will learn how to:
1/2 day or 1 day
This course is offered as both a tailored in-house half-day and full-day workshop.
The half-day workshop is designed for organisations with established competency and behavioural questions and robust HR support for the panel. It focuses on understanding key concepts and legislative requirements and practising interview demeanour and questions.
The full-day workshop is a comprehensive program that includes establishing or refining role requirements and selection criteria, creating behavioural interview questions, and containing more in-depth exercises and extended interviewing skills practice.
Behavioural interviewing is a method that asks the candidate to talk about specific past experiences. By asking candidates about real-life examples (and not hypothetical situations), it indicates more tangible evidence of behaviours, allowing for a more thorough evaluation of their skills. Research shows that behavioural questions are better predictors of future performance than hypothetical questions. This approach helps reduce bias and forms merit-based decisions.
Structured interviews with standardised questions and scoring criteria help reduce unconscious bias. A panel provides a further step towards reducing bias. When multiple panel members focus on evidence rather than assumptions, it ensures a fairer process and strengthens interview practices. Using a uniform way of scoring responses and comparing notes between panel participants is another key way to eliminate biases.
Cultural alignment occurs when a candidate’s values and behaviours are compatible with the council and the dynamics of the team they would be joining. It fosters better teamwork, engagement, and long-term retention. It’s important to balance cultural fit with diversity and inclusion in hiring decisions; otherwise, teams lack variety in thinking.
Effective behavioural questions focus on specific scenarios that are relevant to the role. A great method is to frame questions using the STAR technique, requesting that candidates describe the Situation, Task, Action, and Result of a past experience. This structure helps obtain detailed, meaningful responses of demonstrated experience and capability.
Things like relying on gut instinct, asking leading or irrelevant questions, and failing to probe for details and facts are common pitfalls in interviews. These can be avoided by preparing thoroughly, sticking to a structured format, and using probing questioning techniques to clarify responses. Panels need to be consistent to treat all candidates equitably.
A positive candidate experience begins with clear communication, a welcoming environment, and respectful interaction. Providing timely feedback and transparency about the process also leaves a lasting impression. When candidates feel valued and respected, they are more likely to see the council in a positive light, even if they are not selected.
Note-taking is essential to ensure assessments are based on accurate information rather than a potentially unreliable memory. Then, there is a clear record for panel discussions, which leads to consistency in evaluating candidates. Detailed notes also demonstrate fairness and accountability to the candidate.
Consistent scoring requires a predefined framework with specific criteria for evaluating responses. Assigning weight to specific skills or attributes can also help prioritise what matters most for the role. Regular checking in with other panel members ensures consistency and fairness throughout the process.
Addressing biases promptly involves discussing observations between panel members and referring back to the predefined scoring criteria. Merit-based hiring relies on transparency and accountability during the decision-making process. Regularly reviewing and updating interview practices fosters continual improvement.
Call us on 1300 655 098 or send us a quick info request to discuss how ICML can help your leaders deliver advanced presentations.