A flawed interview costs more than time, so hiring the right candidate is crucial. Interviews allow us to evaluate cultural alignment and technical and social skills. Interview panels help in making the interview fair and bias-free.
This course equips anyone joining an interview panel with the tools and techniques to conduct interviews that judge candidates on their merits. With a focus on behavioural interviewing and eliminating unconscious bias, you’ll learn to gather evidence effectively to make objective, informed hiring decisions.
This panel interviewing course is designed for anyone joining an interview panel recruiting internal and external candidates. It suits hiring managers, HR professionals and other colleagues involved in the recruitment process who want to enhance their interviewing skills and ensure fair and effective hiring practices.
In this Interviewing Skills for Panel Members course, participants will learn how to:
1/2 day or 1 day
This course is offered as both a half-day and full-day workshop.
The half-day workshop is designed for organisations with established competency and behavioural questions, and robust HR support for the panel. It focuses on understanding key concepts and legislative requirements, and practising interview demeanour and questions.
The full-day workshop is a comprehensive program that includes establishing or refining role requirements and selection criteria, with more in-depth exercises and extended role plays of the interviewing process, building greater confidence and skills to conduct merit-based panel interviews
Behavioural interviewing is a method that asks for specific past experiences to predict future performance. Asking candidates about real-life examples provides more tangible evidence of behaviours, allowing for a more thorough evaluation of their skills. This approach helps reduce bias and forms merit-based decisions.
Structured interviews with standardised questions and scoring criteria help reduce unconscious bias. When multiple panel members focus on evidence rather than assumptions, it ensures a fairer process and strengthens interview practices. Using a uniform way of scoring responses is another way to eliminate biases.
Cultural alignment occurs when a candidate’s values and behaviours are compatible with the organisation and the dynamics of the team they would be joining. It fosters better teamwork, engagement, and long-term retention. It’s important to balance cultural fit with diversity and inclusion in hiring decisions; otherwise, teams lack variety in thinking.
Effective behavioural questions focus on specific scenarios that are relevant to the role. They are framed using the STAR technique, requesting that candidates describe the Situation, Task, Action, and Result of a past experience. This structure helps obtain detailed, meaningful responses of demonstrable experience and capability.
Things like relying on gut instinct, asking leading or irrelevant questions, and failing to probe for details and facts are the common pitfalls. These can be avoided by preparing thoroughly, sticking to a structured format, and using probing questioning techniques to clarify responses. Panels need to be consistent with all candidates to develop fairness.
A positive candidate experience begins with clear communication, a welcoming environment, and respectful interaction. Providing timely feedback and transparency about the process also leaves a lasting impression. Candidates who feel valued and respected are more likely to view the organisation favourably, whether selected or not.
The STAR technique helps candidates provide structured answers by focusing on the Situation, Task, Action, and Result. It ensures responses are clear and detailed, making it easier for interviewers to assess relevance and effectiveness. Encouraging candidates to use STAR also means comparisons can be made between interviewees. Participants in the ICML Interviewing Skills for Panel Members course also learn to make notes capturing interviewees’ STAR responses.
Note-taking is essential to ensure assessments are based on accurate information rather than a potentially unreliable memory. Then, there is a clear record for panel discussions, which leads to consistency in evaluating candidates. Detailed notes also demonstrate fairness and accountability to the candidate.
Consistent scoring requires a predefined framework with specific criteria for evaluating responses. Assigning weight to specific skills or attributes can also help prioritise what matters most for the role. Regular checking in with other panel members ensures consistency and fairness throughout the process.
Addressing biases promptly involves discussing observations between panel members and referring back to the predefined scoring criteria. Merit-based hiring relies on transparency and accountability during the decision-making process. Regularly reviewing and updating interview practices fosters continual improvement.
Call us on 1300 655 098 or send us a quick info request to discuss how ICML can help your leaders deliver advanced presentations.